Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star trek babies

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge. ugen64 23:42, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Star trek babies

The article claims that this is a "proposed" Star Trek spinoff, and has two supposed references - however both references are broken links. Unless there is some proof that this was proposed by an actual Star Trek producer (not just a fan), it should be deleted as speculation. Rhobite 00:40, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. It already provides a link to an article on Memory Alpha, unneeded here. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:32, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Star Trek, other storylines. There is a TV subsection which this could possibly fit into. This is listed under [1] and TV series [2] as "Star Trek Babies":

"During the 1980's, a proposed animated series was in the works at Marvel Productions, then later moved to development at Hanna-Barbera. Series was similar in concept to "Muppet Babies," but with the crew of the original "Star Trek" series, reduced by a 'space cloud' to tots, though still with full knowledge and capability of running the Enterprise. Though concept sketches were undoubtedly produced, so far as TBTC has been able to determine, no actual footage or finished work was ever completed." On quite a few message boards I Googled, I notice there were rumours of a proposed Warner Brothers film that was discussed in in 1996 but ultimately scrapped. Megan1967 08:27, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• merge as per Megan1967. Thryduulf 16:54, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as above although I vaguely remember this was an April Fool's Joke years ago. 23skidoo 21:48, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, more important than an article on a pokemon character. --Spinboy 23:54, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as it was never actually produced I don't think it warrants its own ST-series article --Hooloovoo 16:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.