Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stannington First School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus for deletion. --Sam Blanning(talk) 17:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stannington First School
Non-notable primary school (to "year 4"), fails test in Wikipedia:Schools. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 18:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 21:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet WP:SCHOOL. Catchpole 06:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- WP:SCHOOLS is not a deletion criteria. If you read the page you'll see it recommends merging the information into an article about the parent community. — RJH (talk) 21:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well you try merging it into Stannington, Morpeth then. We don't have an article on the parent community. Catchpole 07:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- WP:SCHOOLS is not a deletion criteria. If you read the page you'll see it recommends merging the information into an article about the parent community. — RJH (talk) 21:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into local community or school district page per WP:SCHOOLS. — RJH (talk) 21:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge ALKIVAR™ ☢ 22:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per the above. --Myles Long 22:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to local community or school district article per RJHall. Yamaguchi先生 02:38, 22 October 2006
- Comment Again where exactly do you propose merging this article to? Catchpole 10:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment Technically, it could be merged to Morpeth, Northumberland, which is the "real" parent community, Stannington being an unincorporated area, I believe. But this idea of merging unimportant information bothers me. Does information on a single primary school really belong in an article on the town it's part of? I certainly don't see how it could advance the article in any way, and don't see why someone who cares about that article won't immediately remove it as inappropriate. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Is a not notable primary school with no assertion of notability that doesn't even meet the proposed WP:SCHOOL which was highly generous to school inclusion. JoshuaZ 17:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
