Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staircycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Staircycle
This page was tagged as needing evidence of notability, but there was none forthcoming. There are no references to reliable sources, and the only external link is a youtube video. I see nothing indicating that this passes WP:N, WP:V, or WP:RS. Deranged bulbasaur 06:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable. Article reads like a simple definition and provides no claim to notability except a link to a Youtube video ad. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 06:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep- It does seem to be a real thing and notable [1], but it is the article on it that needs to be fixed. -=Elfin=-341 06:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Look a little closer at those google hits (there's not many of them to look at). They're just pages advertising the product or mentioning the product. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 06:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Some way to go to achieve notability; at the moment it's just a gimmick. BTLizard 13:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of notability and reliable sources on the subject. At best it may warrant a mention on bicycle or list of bicycle types but again .. without sources .. Arkyan • (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete no reliable sources on the internet besides advertisement. Since no professionals have reviewed the product yet, it's not notable.--Kylohk 19:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.