Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Clements University Network

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] St Clements University Network

Unaccredited university of no provable significance, contains special pleading, work of a single purpose account. I'm tempted to simply nuke it but there might be some merit in it, especially if we can find cited sources for controversy or allegations of being a degree m ill (which it probably is). On the other hand, we may well be better off without it. Guy 21:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete POV fork from St Clements University. Arbusto 22:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Google returns only 11 results, 5 unique. One of these is completely unrelated (#5, specifically). I can find no evidence of any controversy. Srose (talk) 22:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Message from Dr Philip Li, UCLA philip@uclalumni.net

Please note my posting in discussions board, indeed this non traditional University offers programs and have an international network schools with all their names and phone on, most of them are medium to big government schools.

My experience with their partner University in China (UCLA is working with South China Technology University on their master program) shows that they have very strict requirement in choosing partners and St Clements have postgraduate lanaguage programs with them too. The program is more then 1 year and is certainly not a diploma mill.

If anyone is interested I can ask their professors to talk a bit on that in Wikipedia. It is sad that I heard that they cannot access wikipedia.org and I have to redirect this discussions to them.

We have to be fair to global learning institutions and not only conclude from one angle. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Philip.UCLA (talk • contribs) 05:02, 17 September 2006 UTC.

Merge what? Nothing is sourced. Arbusto 17:55, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.