Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StLouisMojo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 11:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] StLouisMojo and StLouisMojo.Com

advert for nn website, delete Savidan 21:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails to meet WP:WEB guidelines. YASNS. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 21:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn group of websites Ruby 22:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Kinu 23:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
• No Delete It is not YASNS as it differs substantially from other social networking sites that are designed for broad national and international appeal. This series of sites that stretch from Seattle to Virginia Beach are local community sites unlike Friendster and MySpace which by the way get passes in Wikipedia. The mature Mojo site in Louisville is the dominant on-line media force in that region something that none of the other listed sites can say. Therefore that is noteable on it's own standing. Unlike the other social networking sites listed, there is no external link, unlike others no domain address and the information provided is a minimal description. Wudman 01:09, 11 February 2006 UTC

This user's only edits were on feb 10 -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 11:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

• • Okay, Wudman, so does it pass WP:WEB? --Perfecto 03:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
    • I actually reviewed the WP:WEB guidelines, followed links around to understand allied points of this policy and prior to posting the page, compared the pages describing other "noteable" social networking sites. It is my opinion that the StLouisMojo page passes muster. Wudman 04:01, 11 February 2006 UTC
  • What part of WP:WEB does it pass? And the proof? --Perfecto 04:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both as adverts for random social networking websites. If proof of it passing WP:WEB is provided, I'm happy to change. Stifle 01:02, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.