Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Joseph Academy (Cleveland, Ohio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If this is not expanded beyond a single sentence in the near future, please merge as appropriate. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] St. Joseph Academy (Cleveland, Ohio)

St. Joseph Academy (Cleveland, Ohio) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable school, nearly 11 months old and never expanded. Seinfreak37 15:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep & Expand WP:SCHOOL --Djsasso 17:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep & Expand WP:SCHOOL --Hornandsoccer _Contribs^Talk 21:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Completely non-notable school with a one sentence article. 11 months is more than long enough for some sort of expansion. Soltak | Talk 00:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Noroton 15:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep & Expand Noroton 15:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or cite, and AfD is not a vote. There is no assertion of notability by secondary source citation, and I can't find a thing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 17:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Sadly, there are plenty of administrators who will close this debate in accordance with their own preferences, and without any regard for out community guidelines on the need for independent references. Further, a large number of administrators do tend to treat these discussions as votes, alas. WMMartin 14:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep. The school was established in 1890, and according to its website is the only all-girl Catholic high school in the City of Cleveland.[1] I'd still like to see more in the way of sources (especially secondary sources), but that's enough of a claim of notability for me to say keep. --Elonka 22:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Notability neither asserted nor evidenced. The assertions about age and gender-specificity are in no way notable, as these are perfectly within the normal range for peer schools. Finally, this article lacks independent references, which Wikipedia's guidelines say all articles should have. WMMartin 14:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep While I agree there is some serious expansion (maybe there website (if there is one) would help, but schools, academys, colleges, etc are notable, especially if those have a particularity (ex:private schools, girl schools, etc--JForget 00:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per JForget --Masterpedia 03:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.