Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. James Music Press

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert ^{T | @ | C} 04:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] St. James Music Press

I see no notability, or encyclopedic content here. Non-notable company. feydey 21:31, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, "Anthems from SJMP have been heard on national broadcasts". Kappa 22:59, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as blatant advertisement Renata3 23:25, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete but this company is part of a notable movement in choral music in which a company sells a single copy of an anthem along with duplication rights, instead of selling multiple copies individually as is the usual practice. Kind of like a site-license for software. If an article about this practice were written, this company could be one of several examples mentioned in the article. Any idea what to call it? —Wahoofive (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advert --Rogerd 03:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Izehar 21:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - no refs, no real assertions of notoriety. Zordrac 11:09, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.