Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Blog's Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.Voice of All^T|@|ESP 22:39, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] St. Blog's Parish

Umm, right... wikipedia is not a directory of the web/vanity/advertisement. This appears to be hosted off earthlink, so I couldn't really do an alexa ranking of it. The google hits are full of incestuous linking so I don't find those relevent considering this is some webring. Skrewler 00:28, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Nice thought, and condolances for the death of the founding member, but very much non-notable. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 00:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. As nominated. non-notable blogjunk. --Timecop 01:02, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Stop clogging my internet. -- Femmina 01:41, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: The aggregate of separate blogs is not a cumulative significance. Essentially, this is a portal page for blogs. Although a few of these, such as blogspot, might be so overwhelmingly central as to pass the threshold, almost none others will. Geogre 02:42, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Jtmichcock 04:36, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom. Don't worry about the Alexa issue, the intersection of notable websites and Earthlink hosted sites is probably a null set anyway. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 18:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.