Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stéphane Jouanneau
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Stéphane Jouanneau
Yet another "blowgun master" resume. Damiens.rf 13:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Guaraini Headhunting Delete: A mighty 46 unique Google hits [1], not a single one from a reliable source, and dominated by Wiki mirrors and personal webpages. RGTraynor 13:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment No idea if this is a current Wikidrama or Hoax or something but according to WP:ATHLETE seems to state that they can stay based on competing at the top of their sport...no matter how silly we feel it is. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 15:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have a problem with the same guys founding the sports federations, organizing the competitions and holding the world records. --Damiens.rf 15:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Reply: To quote from WP:ATHLETE: "Competitors and coaches who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports (who meet the general criteria of secondary sources published about them)." (emphasis mine) RGTraynor 15:42, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Simply a list without prose (no sentences!). No references - simply a link to the corresponding article in French Wikipedia. No apparent reliable sources supporting assertions stated or implied in the list. Regarding WP:ATHLETE: it doesn't apply if the sport isn't covered by reliable sources. B.Wind (talk) 05:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- Expand or Delete. WP:ATHLETE notwithstanding, articles need (preferably secondary) sources and content. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.