Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri ramakrishna vidyashala
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. WjBscribe 23:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sri ramakrishna vidyashala
Not encyclopedic and promotional in nature; I would've like to see actual information about the school itself Fcsuper 18:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. According to The Hindu, the school "is reckoned to be one of the leading educational institutions in the State".[1] The current content is indeed inappropriate, but the article can be transformed into an adequate stub easily enough. EALacey 19:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The article's creator has also placed versions of this article at Sri Ramakrishna Vidyashala and Srkvs. If this article is deleted, those should go too; if it's kept, it should be redirected to Sri Ramakrishna Vidyashala. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EALacey (talk • contribs) 19:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 02:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup, significant media coverage. Hornplease 08:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Hornplease 09:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep; as the nom has said, it needs expansion. Currently it's a well sourced advert for good school. John Vandenberg 09:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep - It is one of the most reputed residential schools in Karnataka and consistently produces some of the top rankers in board examinations year after year. Sarvagnya 09:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Sarvagnya. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 11:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but add more sources than just one newspaper and tag it cleanup.Shindo9Hikaru 22:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
