Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squelm

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 11:46, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Squelm

Neologism or hoax. --W(t) 21:19, 2005 May 20 (UTC)

• Delete this squelm. I squelming like this squelming word a lot, it's squelmily useful. But it doesn't get a single squelming Google hit, so it's pure squelm. ----Isaac R 21:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• delete as forumcruft neologism. Brighterorange 21:59, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism, 0 Google hits suggest it barely even qualifies as that. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:39, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, neologism. Megan1967 02:10, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.