Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squeeks

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete · Katefan0^(scribble) 03:28, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Squeeks

Non-notable bio page for a BBS persona. CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per above. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete forumcruft. — brighterorange (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Well... Seeing that even Jennicam had an article and seeing the success Squeeks thread were beginning to have, I just tought about adding her to Wikipedia in hope that other users from 4chan would add a lot of informations about her since she's becoming more famous than local figures there. (Don't know if I did this explaination in the right format sorry but I have no account there to sign this)—Preceding unsigned comment added by User:172.211.213.55 (talk • contribs)
• Delete Sorry but Jennicam is notable, a site with high traffic maintained for many years, featured on BBC News etc. Nothing personal, all forum members are deleted, unless they're deemed notable, like John Titor for example. --TM ^(talk) 22:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. (ﾉ∀`) oh 4chan... Thatdog 23:28, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or Speedy under A7. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:54, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - orioneight (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Breasts are not a valid substitute for notability. -- Bobdoe (Talk) 03:40, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• O RLY? Yulia Nova

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.