Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squarular
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 01:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Squarular
Did not speedily delete as a nonsense page. Looks like a not notable neologism to me. I found nothing on Google scholar or Google news. Google web search shows limited usage. My favorite is "I have a tendency to go off on people about how squarular should be a word until they get tired ." Then there is this bit of intellectual insight "Interestingly enough my honor students taught me the words squaricle and squarular (um, I think they're geometry terms...I don't teach math) today. (such is the state of education today.) Perhaps it's a new synonym for rectangle. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 18:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Dlohcierekim 18:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, see WP:NEO, WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Although a bunch of people seem to be using it informally (to mean "square," "cubic," or "tiled"), it's still well within the purview of WP:NEO. Furthermore, there is no potential whatsoever for this article to be more than a dicdef. AnturiaethwrTalk 19:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as a neologism.--Berig (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- speedy Delete as unreferenced and unreferencible, i.e., nonverifiable. Mukadderat (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
