Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spyrus (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete SkierRMH (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spyrus

Spyrus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Portmanteau word/neologism with no evidence that it is in widespread use. The definition is a little vague, and it's certainly not a "new kind" of malware as described in the article. Google hits are not even in triple digits,[1] and a lot of the results are irrelevant ("Spyrus" as a company/group/product name, etc). Contested prod, giving one source where the term is used ([2]), but this alone is not evidence of widespread usage. ~Matticus ^U_C 00:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

• Additional note - the first AfD is completely unrelated. ~Matticus ^U_C 00:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as above, no evidence that this is in widespread use, and no secondary sources about the term as per WP:NEO. Lankiveil 00:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC).
• Delete: Per NEO. - Rjd0060 01:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NEO and WP:NOT#DICTIONARY Chris! _ct 03:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, this is an encyclopedia not a dictionary. RFerreira 08:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 12:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per Neo. Twenty Years 13:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per WP:SNOW. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 14:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.