Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spunky Dunker Donuts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spunky Dunker Donuts

Fails WP:CORP by about a light year. Fan-1967 03:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom Scottmsg 03:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Actually fails WP:CORP by a parsec. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 03:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per above. Would speedy, but CSD doesn't have the appropriate criteria. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. I love donuts as much as the next guy, but please... ---Charles 04:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lost me with first sentence, but the address at the end didn't help, either. Daniel Case 04:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 08:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Name+address+business type+telephone number. A classic business directory listing, with a little personal opinion puffery added on top. Get thee to Yellowikis! Wikipedia is not a business directory. Delete. Uncle G 11:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a collection of "nice little donut shops". NawlinWiki 13:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: It appears that we are dealing with more and more corporate advertising stubs every day in AfD. Could we be any clearer that this sort of thing isn't alowed on the 'edit new page' screens? Oh and delete per wp:corp --Amists 14:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete does not meet WP:CORP --mathewguiver 20:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.