Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sporkeh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:11, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sporkeh

Tagged for speedy as recreation, but has never been AfD'd. Appears to be a good-faith article (although I had to remove some slightly silly stuff). Whether we collect articles on each virus or not, is for AfD. -Splash^talk 03:06, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

• Not sure about this one, but if it stays, it can use a copyedit for us non-virus experts. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:18, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As usual, no deletion required. Trollderella 18:45, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This appears to be fake. No information on "sporkeh" or "sp0rkeh" in McAfee's virus archives, and really, what virus is related to the Cyberathlete Professional League and Counter-Strike? As to the larger question of whether every computer virus deserves an article, that's a big emphatic no as there are literally millions of viruses that affect Windows. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 20:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. --FOo 05:51, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete given the absence from McAfee's virus library which is pretty comprehensive, this appears to be a hoax, and not one that has generated any interest apart from this AfD (note that I made no explicit request in my nomination, so I'm not doubling up). -Splash^talk 06:48, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.