Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splendidcrm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is the article fails the notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Splendidcrm

Splendidcrm (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable software. Corvus cornix_talk 05:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete; I agree with Corvus cornix; I'm not sure the article even tries to assert notability. Shell ^babelfish 20:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep While I agree the software itself may not be notable, it's licensing structure has significant bearing on open source licensing issues.Miserablyeverafter (talk) 02:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: No assertion of notability. There's more discussion of the licence terms than anything else. According to the (albeit defunct) software notability guideline, there should be multiple non-trivial published works about the product. This does not pass WP:N: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." -- Mark Chovain 06:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete directory entry lacking independent sources or evidence of encyclopaedic notability. Guy (Help!) 09:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.