Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Splash conception

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (but move if a more accurate name is found). -- BD2412 ^talk 22:55, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Splash conception

• Delete dicdef at best. Friday 21:58, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This has encyclopedic potential. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:27, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. In agreement with Tony. -mysekurity 22:53, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems to be a real phenomena with potential for a larger article. Pburka 22:55, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but suspect it may have a proper name, so prefer that name. It only gets 457 Google hits at this name, but I don't know what else to look for. It certainly has nothing to do with how I came to be. -Splash 22:58, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Delete. This is certainly a genuine phenomenon, but this is certainly not the proper name for it. I looked at a good chunk of the Google hits for "splash conception" and saw only band names and slang usage. A search on Google Scholar for "splash conception" turns up no hits, and a search on the same for splash conception (no quotes) turns up nothing related to human reproduction. We need someone with a thorough grounding in biological science to cough up an educated opinion on this. Fernando Rizo 23:09, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
  • In light of the Penn State Collegian interview with the Planned Parenthood volunteer, I'm willing to give this one a weak keep until proven otherwise. Fernando Rizo 04:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep pending a better name being found, in which case move. Kappa 23:36, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for now, apparent neologism. Dcarrano 23:40, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I got pregnant and sued Olestra. Best I can do for now is http://www.dailycollegian.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/10/07/3f820e7f0f03a?in_archive=1 (the first part was a lie, but sounded nice.) Category 00:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. I agree though that a better biological name should be found for this. JamesBurns 08:51, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep--Simon.Pole 22:16, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Comment There is no "conception" article, just a disambig. Otherwise I'd support redirecting there. Support rename suggestions if suitable name can be found. Friday 05:07, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.