Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit of Delta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Delta Air Lines. Rx StrangeLove 22:40, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spirit of Delta

an article about a singel commercial airplane, whose only claim to fame is that it has a name and was the firwst of its type owned by a particular airline. Doesn't seem notable to me. Delete DES ^(talk) 17:23, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Advertising; the only significant thing about the aircraft is Delta's promotional use of it. No potential to become encyclopedic; this article will never be more than a substub. I just put a link to the external image in Boeing 767. (Possibly might be worth including in the Delta Air Lines article too). Dpbsmith (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2005 (UTC) Changed vote.
• Comment: there's already a long paragraph about the plane in the Delta Air Lines article. The plane is, in fact, much more notable than the stub article indicates; it was bought & paid for by the employees and retirees, through a voluntary contribution scheme, and there was a lot of press attention, etc., at the time, as a story about the loyalty of the employees and so forth. As it happens, I actually wrote up an article about Spirit of Delta a while ago, but then read what was in the main Delta article, and decided it did not really merit an article on its own. MCB 00:06, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Delta Air Lines based on MCB's comment. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per comments by MCB and Dpbsmith. PRueda29 02:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.