Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spin card game
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Spin card game
As far as I can tell this "game" is a complete hoax. The "rankings" are facetious, and there is absolutely no evidence that this game even exists (that I can seem to find), much less passes WP:N. I would welcome any references to prove me wrong in this case but don't believe there are any. --Craw-daddy | T | 00:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The rules aren't even properly exlained. The game makes no sense. This is probably just a group of friends' attempt to get their names onto Wikipedia. MrMelonhead (talk) 02:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Evidently a hoax given the somewhat implausible nature of... well, everything in the article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as totally obvious juvenile and see-through lies, could and probably should be a speedy G3.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 12:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy G1 and accordingly tagged. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 13:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Whatever, as long as we just get rid of it ASAP. Makes no sense whatsoever.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, as a matter of fact. G3 is for obvious hoaxes, which this is. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 14:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- modified accordingly--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 14:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, as a matter of fact. G3 is for obvious hoaxes, which this is. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 14:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Whatever, as long as we just get rid of it ASAP. Makes no sense whatsoever.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
