Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spike band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, unverified aand notability not established with original research concerns. Davewild (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spike band

Spike band (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

AfD'd per private request. According to the request, the article is WP:OR and has no references. Listing out of courtesy; I have no opinion on it. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 19:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. The article has been around since 2005 and in horrible condition. It is total OR and in fact, just plain wrong. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 19:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: How is it wrong? I mean, I don't have any knowledge at all about the subject, but it seems like it makes sense to me. I'm willing to bet if you really wanted to, you could improve this article... Cel ^{Talk to me} 22:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Lacks sources to pass WP:N and many statements appear to be WP:OR. I'd be perfectly happy if someone wanted to improve it, but it hasn't happened for the past two years. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 22:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Dreamspy (talk) 23:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• weak delete. I'd prefer it to be re-named --but what to? (The typo 'studded braclet' gets more ghits)-- and added to a fashion cat. Dan Beale-Cocks 23:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.