Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider-Man 3 (2007 movie)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Spider-Man 3 (I can't find anything to merge). Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spider-Man 3 (2007 movie)

Future event - Crystal ballism Outlander 16:05, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Merge with Spider-Man 3Strong keep. Announced films are not crystal ball. Sony has officially announced the film (see official website). There is also precedent. See Resident Evil: Afterlife, Casino Royale (2006 movie), etc. That said, I have gone in and cleaned up and wikified the article, removing a few statements that can be seen as crystal balling. Changing vote to merge as I was unaware another article already existed on this topic. 23skidoo 02:24, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Movie has an IMDB entry. --Alan Au 16:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. The existence of an IMDb entry is not considered indicative that a planned production actually exists. There was a listing for a movie based upon The Prisoner for several years that was never actually made. 23skidoo 16:36, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep — This one is fairly likely, and it does have the "future film" warning, so I think it's okay to keep. — RJH 16:44, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep -- This movie was confirmed by Sony. xSTRIKEx6864
• Keep. Movie is confirmed and much anticipated. Does not violate "crystal ball rule" and is notable enough. --Plastictv 17:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep factual, notable --Quasipalm 17:30, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Front rank film. Almost certain to be made and its cancellation would itself be notable. CalJW 18:46, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, not crystalballism, this movie is in preproduction already.Gateman1997 19:01, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep we have verifiable information about this now and more can be added as time goes by.

Capitalistroadster 20:00, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep should definitly be expanded as more information becomes available... HoratioVitero 20:17, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep and Redirect to Spider-Man 3 as that entry is more complete. --Grcampbell 23:33, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep/merge as suggested. In fairness, WP:NOT doesn't make this particularly clear. Flowerparty 00:02, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep/merge --scotsworth 22:38, 6 September 2005
• Delete. I'll go out on a limb here. The film has not been finished, it's still in pre-production, and therefore the article can only be speculative. Cnwb 05:43, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete: The movie already has a detailed page, this article addes no additional info, Delete or just add a redirect in it to the movie's main article. --Amr Hassan 07:04, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

• Comment okay, yes merge but not delete...207.158.1.209 15:57, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

• Merge to "Spider-Man 3" article which is more comprehensive. *drew 04:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.