Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sphaeroceroidea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nomination withdrawn and kept. Provided that within an 3 week period that Nonstopdrivel has added sources and this article actually has a paragraph of text to be expanded on. The reasoning behind the time period is because it has already been a blank article for over a year and I know nothing on any subject I edit would normally survive that long without source, references, etc. I'm not trying to be a dick, but it's unacceptable in it's current state. Within 3 weeks, I will nominate for deletion again. — Moe ε 22:48, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sphaeroceroidea

Sphaeroceroidea (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Completely blank article other than an infobox. No references, sources, external links, etc. — Moe ε 21:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep, as there are numerous reliable sources verifying the existence of this taxonomic classification. This article could be fleshed out and sourced. --Nonstopdrivel 22:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Can you please add the reliable sources to this article then? Otherwise, I don't see an article that is just a stub identification and a box. — Moe ε 22:07, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment: If you'll withdraw your nomination, I'll add the article to my watchlist and add some references later in the week. This is somewhat outside my area of expertise, though I was a Bio major in college. --Nonstopdrivel 22:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.