Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spazz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.Voice of All^T|@|ESP 22:34, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spazz

looks like yet another non-notable band... -GTBacchus ^(talk)00:07, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Keep A few releases listed on AllMusicGuide and Amazon albeit on obscure label (Slap A Ham). The label's website is defunct. Seems to have a reasonable cult following Jasmol 01:14, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: I can't quite agree with the above. (I have an AMG entry on my band, and I zealously oppose an article on it, so I'm not being hipocritical.) The reason is that the article says nothing, really, about a band, but merely offers a substub about a guy in the band who owns some..something... and then that there is a screen name in use with the same name. Basically, two CSD "empty" articles combined into one. If this is all there is to say about them, they're not encyclopedic. Geogre 02:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete another minor band. Power violence? That's a new one. Oh, maybe it's just them doing it... Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 17:48, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Geogre. Pburka 21:12, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.