Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spack

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 05:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] spack

There's no such specific person/place/concept/thing as a spack, and therefore no encyclopaedia article to be had. This isn't sexual slang, either. It's just yet another pejorative word, like twunt, but derived in this case from spastic. I transwikied this to Wiktionary:Transwiki:Spack yesterday. It should be indicative that the subsequent edits to the Wikipedia article today were simply to add stuff that would go in the "Related words" section of the dictionary article. Uncle G 12:55, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC)

• Delete - try spaz, perhaps? anyway, this is nowhere as widespread as spaz, and I'm willing to bet it's a neologism. humblefool® 21:58, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 06:36, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• I've heard it used- Redirect to spastic--nixie 11:35, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.