Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space vector inducer

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:51, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Space vector inducer

This page is about a fictional device. Googling it in quotes returned two results, with the same text as this article.

It is not possible to 'inseminate' wormholes, indeed, we don't even know if they exist, lt alone are NASA and ESA doing so.

This is garbage physics!!

Thesatirist 13:24, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Nonsense. Josh Cherry 15:40, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I know little about physics but even I know wormholes exist only in science fiction (presently at least). Thryduulf 15:44, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Put this article in a wormhole. Carrp | Talk 20:14, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fuzzy original research. For starters Newtonian physics and relativity are human descriptions. Differences between them have no effect on the physics involved. Anyway if worm holes do exist, it's not as described here. Wyss 21:30, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nonsense. RJFJR 22:07, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Vector this article into the nearest wormhole (i.e. delete). Edeans 05:57, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:33, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• delete. ComCat 15:27, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.