Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space intelligences

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 01:36, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Space intelligences

I don't see much salvagable here. Looks like OR or conspiracy theory stuff. Delete Friday 08:01, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

• Save The Best Theories are often called the Craziest until the Critics get a chance to do some THINKING, a rare HU-man event. (left unsigned by User:203.26.206.129, author of the page --DNicholls 04:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC))
• Delete --DNicholls 08:05, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I fold the tin-foil hats, you pass them 'round. Hamster Sandwich 08:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: unverifiable to say the least.-Poli (talk • contribs) 16:50, 2005 July 23 (UTC)
• Delete. Not only is it unverifiable, you guys really ought to check out the "Intelligences" section of Theory_of_multiple_intelligences. The section was produced entirely by the same guy, and uses... the exact same example, the example of this 'famous psychic' Ted Owens... And according to the information in the aforementioned article, forced the US to stop the Vietnam war with the help of his aliens. Does anyone else think Patent Nonsense applies? - Wakuseino 20:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
  • In retrospect, considering that it IS Patent Nonsense, I'm voting for Speedy Delete, if possible. - Wakuseino 21:03, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Google does turn up some stuff [1], but it doesn't look very legit. This article doesn't check its fiction, and that might be because the Google hits also present something that's like a conspiracy theory as opposed to characters from a story. Article doesn't explain it's a theory, either. Hmmmm... nn theory. CanadianCaesar 21:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vague speculation. Not even well-known pseudoscience. ManoaChild 09:49, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ... Cyclone49 09:54, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — almost certainly pure fantasy; needs substantial evidence to become encyclopedic. — RJH 17:00, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to SETI. JamesBurns 06:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Patent nonsense. Do not redirect. Binadot 02:34, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.