Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Shuttle Constitution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Space Shuttle Enterprise. – Avi 05:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Space Shuttle Constitution

Not needed. All information is already in Space Shuttle Enterprise Cjosefy 13:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete and redirect to Space Shuttle Enterprise. Everything about the article outside the title seems to be cloned from there. Voice of Treason 13:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect. I learned something new today, but a redirect would serve the same or better purpose. Captainktainer * Talk 13:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Delete and Redirect as per above comments. Scorpiondollprincess 14:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect a different shuttle taking another's place-OK, but a mere name change certainly does not need its own article. --Canley 15:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect contents are redundant with Enterprise article.--J Clear 01:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect I think this artical should be deleted only if someone searching for this artical is redirected to the Enterprise artical. Red1530 16:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per all above. Paddles TC 22:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and keep as redirect, interesting factoid and plausible search term means it should stay, but only as a link to Space Shuttle Enterprise. -- nae'blis (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Enterprise and protect. --Joffeloff 17:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.