Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Nursing Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The references brought up by KillerChihuahua sway the argument toward WP:V being met. -- Samir धर्म 06:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Space Nursing Society

I'm not sure if this is notable. --Neutrality^talk 23:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per featured article on NurseZone: Nursing Society Prepares for Future Flights, they are a NSS (National Space Society) chapter[1], nice career article on Nursing Spectrum Care Up There - the big question is, who can clean up and expand this article? There are a ton of sources for a better treatment of this. A founder of the SNS was elected to the Board of Directors of the NSS and became chair of the Education Committee in 2004[2]. Pity the SNS has such a crappy looking website though. KillerChihuahua^?!? 23:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn with no assertion of notablity. Batmanand | Talk 11:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment most of article was a copyvio from here. Article is now much shorter. -Elmer Clark 12:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nn. "Space Nursing Society" generates only 414 hits on Google. However, it was a featured article in a magazine, as stated above by KillerChihuahua. --Nishkid64 18:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - only link I can see is the article. I get scripting errors with my browsers. GBYork 22:05, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It's not your browser. Those are server-side scripting errors. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 16:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Although the article does a poor job or showing it, per UserKillerChihuahua's research, there are verifiable and reliable sources out there on which an article about the SNS can be built.-- danntm ^T _C 02:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per KillerChihuahua. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As written, the article clearly fails WP:V. Even if the three sources mentioned by KillerChihuahua above were incorporated into the article, I do not believe that NurseZone.com is a "credible, third-party source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Ditto for the National Space Society, which is an advocacy charitable organization, and I could not locate the article on the Nursing Spectrum website. With only around 400 GHits, I could not locate anything else, either. When this organization becomes sufficiently notable, it will be covered by a newspaper or other significant media outlet that passes WP:V. --Satori Son 14:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as failing WP:V per Satori Son. I was really hoping I could find a good reference and save this, alas I couldn't. Ifnord 15:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Fails WP:V. GBYork 22:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.