Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soviet Super Soldier Volkov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Kchase T 08:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Soviet Super Soldier Volkov
In Soviet Russia, article deletes YOU!! Game guide article on minor character (and his dog) in game. (Volkov doesn't seem to have as much as a plot profile as say Tanya Adams -in as much video game cutscenes are "plots") Bwithh 01:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No sources besides pages that just mirror/copy Wikipedia, a Google test shows 45 unique pages, and it doesn't seem notable. J0lt C0la 01:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete What a website! Danny Lilithborne 03:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Article doesn't assert notability. Hello32020 03:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- In Soviet Russia, article on non-notable minor game character delete YOU!! MER-C 03:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Deletov. This → Image:Volkov&chitzkoi.GIF says it all. ~ trialsanderrors 04:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, half the article is about this extremely non-notable games character's appearances in mods.--Nydas(Talk) 08:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, mainly because there's not enough coverage on the dog! Seriously, nn characters w/little connection to the main game. SkierRMH 10:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Soviet Super Delete per others. Punkmorten 12:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- However, both characters are the main focus of both expansion packs! They are not minor characters! Slavik262 16:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Unlikely to be searched under this name, not linked from other articles, bellow threshold of notability IMHO. Pavel Vozenilek 18:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete low noteablity, fails WP:V. "You are sooo deleted." Davidpdx 12:14, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
