The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.—Quarl(talk) 2007-03-11 01:19Z
This article seems a complete original research or hoax. Dojarca 16:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy keep In the future I would suggest using google in languages other than English. I am adding references right now and moving for speedy close. `'mikka 16:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy keep per mikka. Well documented now. Good work. -- BPMullins | Talk 21:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy keep per numerous sources added by mikka. -- Black Falcon 08:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.