Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southeast Leatherfest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Daniel 09:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Southeast Leatherfest
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of sexuality and gender-related deletions. -- — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 19:35, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- I hope that I am doing this correctly but if I am not please forgive me. there is a wiki entry on IML and Folsom Street Fair this event is on par with these events and are fall within the Leather Culture.
A festival of no obvious significance, no evidence of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Guy (Help!) 16:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete It might be of significance, but there is no way of telling without sources.If it is a major festival and the awards recognized generally, it would warrant an article. DGG 05:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)- Keep. It is of significance, though it does indeed need expansion and cleanup. It will be put on the TODO list of the WikiProject LGBT studies if kept. — Madman bum and angel (talk – desk) 16:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete per DGG and Guy. Desperately in need of sources to demonstrate notability. bikeable (talk) 16:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete needs to support notability more with reliable sources.Balloonman 16:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Deleet own webpage and museum blog are insufficient. Needs inline citation as well. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep mentioned in Damron: [www.damron.com/calendar/leather.html], needs to be added to the article but RS do exist, they just need to be found and put together -- a clean up job, not a deletion reason. Carlossuarez46 20:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep on the basis of sources incidentally noticed while finding a source for V.M.Johnson, just above.DGG 23:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can you add these sources to the article? I don't see anything inclining me to change my !vote. thanks. bikeable (talk) 05:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Done a few. DGG 07:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.