Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Side Padawons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 20:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] South Side Padawons

Delete. Non-notable. Google gives "about 55" hits. Hbackman 00:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 00:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not for things you made up on a camping trip. Eivind 01:41, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Eivind. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 01:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as totally nn. Staxringold 02:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Moe Aboulkheir 02:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, agree with all the above, nn -- Samir ∙ T C 08:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable local camping group. JIP | Talk 15:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable Localzuk ^(talk) 15:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-10 04:37Z
• Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 01:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I realized that after I'd already put this page up. I always forget that proposed deletion exists until I've created an AfD. I'll try to remember in the future. Thanks for the heads-up. Hbackman 03:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.