Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South 40

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] South 40

South 40 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't seem to be a notable band; fails all aspects of WP:MUSIC, only source is MySpace. Claims to have played with several notable bands, but that doesn't make them notable themselves. Also a redirect from South 40 (band). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment A speedy was placed earlier but declined without comment by another user. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 02:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources to back the iffy claim for notability. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete-No Sourcing, and only point of reference is a myspace, this band seems less than any underground band, which fails [WP:N] and [WP:MUSIC].TrUCo-X 03:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:MUSIC failure per [1]. I found maybe one decent article [2]. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 03:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 11:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Maybe someday it will be seen as notable and the article can be recreated. Now, I'm usually one who supports keeping articles if I think notability can be established but hasn't yet, but in this case the article is so poorly written as a seemingly indiscriminate collection of information that it would be best to just delete it, wait until someone has sources, and start from scratch. Red Phoenix (Talk) 15:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - I created this article as a redirect to Crow (band). I'd just ask that when this is deleted, it is returned to that redirect. Thanks. matt91486 (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, this article was created as South 40 (band). Since South 40 was already created as a redirect, I've cancelled the redirect, moved the content to South 40 and redirected South 40 (band) to South 40. In other words, although the creator of the page is User:Matt91486, the creator of the content is User:Ktoney (who I had already warned about this afd debate) and I was responsable for the redirects. Victao lopes (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, well, this all confuses me with page moves and whatnot, but I think the end result should still be a redirect to Crow (band) or at worst a disambig page if the dorm is really deemed worth keeping. matt91486 (talk) 06:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: Per nom, and per WP:MUSIC. Victao lopes (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Per WP:MUSIC and a failure to establish notability. - Dravecky (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.