Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sourcingizer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:18, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sourcingizer

Sourcingizer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A neologism. Three ghits[1]. Malcolmxl5 19:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable neologism. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Spam. Neologism. Conflict of interest (User:Tradedot). --Victor falk 20:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: The first line of this article gave it away (WP:NEO). - Rjd0060 21:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 13:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.