Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sounds and Mind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sounds and Mind

Sounds and Mind (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

At best, original research. At worst, a collection of grandmotherly advice, unreferenced and without proof. I've listed the problems I found in the content on the talk page of the article and requested the original contributer to offer suggestions to improve it, but 5 days have passed and there has been no response from anyone. Please do have a look. Thanks xC | ☎ 19:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete nothing encyclopedic here. Lakers 19:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research or unattributed claims, possible self promotion for Bindu.B, aka Wizzywiz. If you look here, the original author requested deletion. Jaksmata 21:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the Nominator is completely correct on this one. ~ Arjun 02:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or Transwiki to transcendental wiki of meditation, if it is ever invented. Smmurphy^(Talk) 04:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.