Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoundJam

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy KEEP (nomination retracted) — Gwalla | Talk 23:17, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SoundJam

Non-notable audio software. — Gwalla | Talk 04:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - quite notable, basis for iTunes, even. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I stand corrected. I retract my nomination. — Gwalla | Talk 18:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Interesting and useful software. Non-notable is being used as too heavy a club to destroy articles in here, contact me if you want to form a group whose goal it is to make it so not notible cannot be used as a sole criterion for deleting an article. --ShaunMacPherson 18:03, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. notable audio software by the once-notable Casady and Greene. Probably the leading MP3 player/encoder in the Mac world before iTunes. Interesting history, too. Quasi-abandonware? Why did the developers ask Casady and Greene to stop distributing it? Dpbsmith (talk) 01:34, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Unknown, but presumably has something to do with their contract with Apple. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:37, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.