Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Lascelles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 02:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sophie Lascelles

Speedy Delete (CSD A7) -- I've AFD'd this as while i believe no claim to notability is established, other editors may disagree. This person is over 41st in line for the throne, has done nothing notable. Being in line isnt really notable, when everyboody in the UK is in line. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 19:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Obviously you have no idea of the rules of succession to the UK throne by that statement- only those eligble under the Act of Settlement 1701 are in the line of succession- ie the descendants of Electress Sophia of Hanover. Astrotrain 12:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete; nn-bio. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 19:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete or mergeto George, 7th Earl of Harewood not notable in own right. Edited Ohconfucius 10:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete misses WP:BIO along with the other Lascelleses. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:48, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per other articles nominated by same user -- Roleplayer 02:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep- Astrotrain 12:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • As previous entries, AFD is not a vote. Please explain why, ideally referencing policies and guidelines, a subject who fails to demonstrate notability as proposed by WP:BIO should be included. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
    • OK then- how about being in the line of succession to the British throne is notable Astrotrain 21:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into some article about her family provided that reliable references are added. Ardric47 20:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Ardric. This person has no claim to notability other than being born into a royal family; she has not done anything newsworthy, much less noteworthy. Srose (talk) 20:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.