Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Costa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted per WP:CSD#A3. Pedro :  Chat  20:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sophie Costa

Sophie Costa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod. The article makes no claim that the subject is notable and no references found online to support notability. Tagged as non-notable since November 2007. Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 17:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. This perhaps could have been speedy deleted. freshacconcispeaktome 17:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - no assertion of notability. Also, I have removed all the information that was directly copied from here [1]. Hal peridol (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - does not assert why the subject is notable. ~ mazca talk 19:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - no assertion of notability, no reliable 3rd party sources. xenocidic ( talk ¿ listen ) 19:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as a "no context" and WP:SNOW. Disruptive de-prodding, edit warring, and WP:POINT hardly constitute good reasons to drag out an AfD on a one-sentence article. All of the nominator's actions on this one, including the two prods and now the AfD, have been in good faith, so an early close would be appropriate here. Thank you! Qworty (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - not notable, but as there is only one line about who she is (a painter), I'm going with a no content CSD. So tagged. Person does not assert notability, I have no evidence thereof. That it's listed as a stub is probably moot. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.