Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sony Ericsson J210

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anyone up for referencing the article with the sources located by Cyrus?--Kubigula (talk) 04:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sony Ericsson J210

Sony Ericsson J210 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable product. Insufficient substantial references to create a meaningful Wikipedia article. WP is not a Sony Ericsson catalog. Wikipedia is not a phone guide. Mikeblas (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep if more references can be found, if other Ericsson phones are being listed under their own articles then why shouldn't this be included? Mr Senseless (talk) 17:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Other stuff exists isn't a good enough argument for keeping an article. And in this specific case, plenty of other phones have been deleted, too. If we apply your rationale, we can end up at the result of "delete", too. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep It's a pretty well known phone from what I understand. Here are some links that provide some background info on the phone and some technical specifications: tech specs, brief overview, background info, more info. --Cyrus Andiron 18:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I seriously disagree "every" cellphone is a non-notable product. We should have articles about them. As per above, the article can be properly sourced. Greswik (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:15, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: WikiProject Telecommunications has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.