Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonoma Wire Works

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sonoma Wire Works

Sonoma Wire Works (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This company article was nominated for deletion as spam and references were produced, so taking to a wider audience to see if they are enough. Listing their product article as well.Steve (Slf67) talk 02:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

RiffWorks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
  • I don't understand the nomination. Someone tried to delete it, so someone produced sources for it, and now you're trying to delete it again? Keep swiftly and delist. Grace Note 07:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think it fails WP:CORP
The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself. The references are all to the product of the company, not the company itself. The company does not appear to be the subject of non-trivial published works.
The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications. It isn't.
The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices.4 Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded. It isn't
as far as I can tell, the company is trivial. If the product isn't, then the product can have an article. QuiteUnusual 10:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Grace Note. -Toptomcat 12:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Grace Note. --Lee Vonce 17:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep it is spammy but the references seem to support its inclusion --Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 00:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.