Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic shower

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WjBscribe 01:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sonic shower

Sonic shower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Original research-laden article that lacks reliable sources or even an assertion of notability. EEMeltonIV 21:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Rewrite From the top, the concept of a sonic shower is not limited to Trek, but rather a common enough bit of speculated technology. I think George Jetson said he used one too. [1] is the closest thing I can find so far, but that might be because I'm being drowned out with requests for B'ellana in the sonic shower. FrozenPurpleCube 22:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Even in full Google Books search about 2/3 of the results are Trek-related, but there are enough by non-Trek authors (and here's a Jetsons confirmation) that it could work. Interestingly, the term has been taken up by the advertising industry to refer to small spaces where you hear a specific ad; step away, you can't hear it. --Dhartung | Talk 22:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as per examples above, definatly noteable, but it needs a rewrite and expansion to include non Trek info. Fosnez 09:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as notable, but needs cites. Can you pelase cross-list this to the Science Fiction project, so as to get more input? Bearian 01:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Doesn't have reliable secondary sources. The current sources are both wikis, which don't pass WP:RS. Jay32183 01:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, a notable Star Trek concept. JIP | Talk 10:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.