Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic blade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - There is only one clear 'delete' vote, in addition to the nomination, which is an implicit 'delete' vote. I take Kenthicken to be in favour of 'keep'. There is a minimum of discussion here, and I would ordinarily relist the item. However, the article is clearly a candidate for speedy deletion and I exercise some prerogative in deleting, so that this matter may be finished off. - Richardcavell 01:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sonic blade
WP:SPAM more advercrap Rklawton 18:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- How is this considered "advercrap?" There is no advertising here. (Kenthicken 18:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC))
- Why else would you post a non-notable product in Wikipedia? Are you now going to tell us you have no connected interest in this product? Rklawton 18:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Who determines if a product is notable or not? This particular product was a link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infomercial. Does that not make it notable? If that is the case, then some serious editing would have to be done on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infomercial page, since over 50% of the "notable infomercial products" listed there link to nothing, and should be considered non-notable as well. Personally, it makes no difference to me if this particular product is removed or not, but you should really look at removing the other "non-notable" products from the referring page as well. (Kenthicken 20:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC))
- We do. And that sounds like a GREAT idea! Rklawton 21:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Fine with me. Done. (Kenthicken 21:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC))
- We do. And that sounds like a GREAT idea! Rklawton 21:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Who determines if a product is notable or not? This particular product was a link from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infomercial. Does that not make it notable? If that is the case, then some serious editing would have to be done on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infomercial page, since over 50% of the "notable infomercial products" listed there link to nothing, and should be considered non-notable as well. Personally, it makes no difference to me if this particular product is removed or not, but you should really look at removing the other "non-notable" products from the referring page as well. (Kenthicken 20:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC))
- Why else would you post a non-notable product in Wikipedia? Are you now going to tell us you have no connected interest in this product? Rklawton 18:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Dark Shikari 18:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
