Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somerville School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carioca 02:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Somerville School

Somerville School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable school --Gimlei ^{(talk to me)} 11:56, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• Reluctant delete I dislike deleting schools, as they're generally enough of a focal point of their community to be notable (and to get the requisite press coverage), but as things stand this is unsourceable. Given the school closed prior to the internet age, sources likely exist in print archives somewhere; if anyone can dig some out, change to keep — iridescent (talk to me!) 11:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect our viewers to the Bromborough article. We cannot use blogspot as a source, it is not "reliable" per our standards. Burntsauce 17:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Gimlei. CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete There are no sources except for a blog, no notability of any kind is stated, and as noted by Iridescent, the school closed so long ago that it would be nigh impossible to dig up reliable sources. I wouldn't necessarily be against a redirect, but I can't imagine how many people will actually search for this (as there was only one real editor of the article, and they have no other edits, and as the school was destroyed circa 40 years ago). -- Mike (Kicking222) 19:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.