Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solosez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Solosez

Originally speedied for CSD-G1 patent nonsense, but isn't. But there is a potential issue with notability and WP:WEB so sent here instead. Note: technical nomination - no opinion from me. ➨ ≡ЯΞDVΞRS≡ 19:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I was fixing it up a little bit when the AFD notice was added. While it would seem to have limited notability, it is the largest online community of the American Bar Association, and is notable to those in the field. Tufflaw 19:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. If you run a Google Test on Solosez you will find over 10,000 results all relating to the Solosez e-mail community, including countless legal resource lists. As Tufflaw indicated, Solosez is notable within the legal community, particularly among solos and small firm attorneys (which account for almost 90% of all law firms, according to a recent lawyer demographics study). KennedyLaw 23:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Solosez is an important resource for small and solo practitioners and is well known within the legal community. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.236.112 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep per Tufflaw. -- ReyBrujo 06:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Solosez has influence well beyond its 2200 plus users. It is often cited in magazine articles and other publicatiosn relevant to the legal community. There are many online communities of interest, some of professionals, but this multinational cooperative group of otherwise unconnected lawyers is fairly unique. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.179.20.70 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep -- This is a most valuable resource and has become a virtual community of lawyers helping lawyers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 164.58.129.243 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep -- It should be expanded though. Mark it as a stub. 207.235.22.84 03:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.