Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solosexuality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Autosexuality. Mindmatrix 18:40, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Solosexuality

Neologism. Not a real term (60 hits on Google, no hits for define:Solosexuality on Google).

  • Delete --Quasipalm 22:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral Google isn't the only source of whether or not something exists. May be it doesn, maybe it doesn't. --D-Day 22:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral But there should be a verifiability tag on the page with an external reference to a definition. -- MatthewDBA 22:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, "solosexual" returns about 1,100 hits on Google and appears to be a legitimate, albeit rare, term. --Muchness 22:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep but i swear theres another word for this already, in which case, redir.--CastAStone 22:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Redirect and Merge to Autosexuality --CastAStone 00:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Autosexuality. Redirect if you honestly want to. --Apostrophe 22:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect and merge to Autosexuality - Thesquire (talk - contribs) 23:08, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I was going to say redirect to autoeroticism but that's a redirect to autosexuality. Redirect per Thesquire. Endomion 02:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Autosexuality. It's a legitimate subject. Stifle 01:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.