Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solipsism syndrome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yuser31415 03:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Solipsism syndrome

Solipsism_syndrome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Why delete? it seems the merge suggestion is more appropriate. Jeffhoy 16:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep or merge. It looks real to me. YechielMan 17:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• keep Only one known reference at the moment, but the fact that it's in a NASA study tells me that it's more than just bunk, the study is also linked from the article, proving that it does indeed use the term. More than a mere dictdef, it contains interesting and sourced information on a topic that appears to be noteworthy. It's also pretty well-written. Wintermut3 18:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• keep i see no reason to delete this article. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 22:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

KEEP. The article just needs supporting references; it would be a shame to delete. Solipsism as a philosophy and solipsism as a syndrome are different enough to warrant two separate entries (with cross-references).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.