Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldier (party)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. GRBerry 17:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Soldier (party)

Soldier (party) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

So far as can be determined from the article, not a real party. Of course, considering the complete lack of sources, the phenomenon described might not be real either. Morgan Wick 09:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 15:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Only one person seem to have been elected to a high enough position to be notable (Joseph McNamara per Ontario general election, 1919), but his article was deleted. Burzmali 16:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep This shows how tremendous the impact of WWI had on society, that people would state their veteran status on ballots; this was the same for all countries that were in the war since 1914 (no one named, no one forgotten)I've extended the stub & put a 'unreferenced' template--Victor falk 01:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep If it's probably true and just needs a reference or two, I'm willing to give it time. It seems like a notable topic for its time and place. Shalom ^Hello 02:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.