Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sojourn

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Speedy deleted because Dictdef already in Wiktionary

[edit] Sojourn

Belongs in wiktionary User:damicatz 00:24, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

• It's already in Wiktionary, and has been for months. Delete. Uncle G 01:02, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
• Since that's the case, this can be deleted --nixie 02:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, since iterwiki would be useless. --Sn0wflake 03:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:47, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. CSD rule A2 should be expanded to cover cases like this. jni 08:50, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • That was my immediate thought, too. Uncle G 13:49, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Delete under CSD case A2 (leftover after successful transwiki). The current wording of the case is a holdover from when the only other WikiMedia projects were other languages. Rossami (talk) 02:50, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above. HyperZonk^talk 18:29, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.