Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software engineering legal

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. --FCYTravis 5 July 2005 08:04 (UTC)

[edit] Software engineering legal

Bad title, no context, smells of copyvio, could become pov-fest if someone tried to make an article at that title. Kiand 15:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• First of all, if this is a copyvio, the orginal author should be too embarrassed to complain. This is a mish-mash of ideas under a poorly named article and, worse, in not accurate from a legal standpoint. I am not sure any of that really is ground for deletion, but I vote a weak delete. DS1953 16:49, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Merge anything salvageable into Software patent which is a good article that lacks some of the practicality this one attempts to provide. Then Delete - do not redirect, since there's no such things as 'software engineering legal'.-Splash 19:29, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge anything useable to Software patent. JamesBurns 07:02, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Poorly named article with nothing worth saving. Quale 17:42, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I see nothing really worth merging. Note that if any of this content is merged (copied into) another article we cannot delete the redirect afterwards due to the attribution requirements of the GFDL license. Sjakkalle (Check!) 29 June 2005 11:16 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.